letter to the editor (the star newspaper, malaysia)

23 February 2011

The Editor,

Menara Star

 

Dear Editor,

The Asian Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW), which is a regional organisation working for women’s rights, believes that it is a woman’s right, and not any one else’s, to decide what to do with her body and her pregnancy. Women are capable, intelligent beings who make difficult choices everyday of their lives. They are half of Malaysia’s population, one third of Malaysia’s workforce, hold 13% of the seats in parliament, are an integral part of Malaysia’s development, and are the only ones who can get pregnant. Why should then we remove that belief in a woman’s capacity to decide, just because it has to with what is most intimately and integrally her business—her body and her pregnancy?Women must be trusted to make choices—whether that is carrying the pregnancy to term and keeping the child, adoption or safe termination of pregnancy. It is the responsibility of the government—which is a secular, not a religious body, and which has committed to gender equality by signing international agreements such as the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Beijing Platform for Action at the UN Fourth World Conference on Women and the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development—to enable and support women to be able to act on their decision safely. This means that women must be given accessible and comprehensive array of services that does not stop at adoption services and halfway homes, but includes access to all methods of contraception services (that empower and allow women informed choice on how to prevent pregnancies in the first place) and safe abortion services.

These services are especially critical for women who have lesser forms of social power at their disposal: the poor, the young, those less educated, migrants and refugees, as well as those whose pregnancies are unintended and the sexual encounters which led to these pregnancies may also have been unwanted. From a humane perspective, choices must always be available. If women choose not to exercise these choices according to their religious beliefs, then it is fine. But we should not let our beliefs colour and limit the choices available.

This letter was published in The Star Newspaper on 27 February 2011. The link to view it is: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/2/27/focus/8141787&sec=focus

 

Vietnam

  • Centre for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population (CCIHP)

Indonesia

  • Aliansi Satu Visi (ASV);
  • CEDAW Working Group;
  • Hollaback! Jakarta;
  • Institut Kapal Perempuan;
  • Kalyanamitra;
  • Komnas Perempuan;
  • Remaja Independen Papua/Independent Youth
    Forum Papua (FRIP/IYFP);
  • Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia (PKBI);
  • Perkumpulan Lintas Feminis Jakarta;
  • Perkumpulan Pamflet Generasi;
  • RUTGERS Indonesia;
  • Sanggar SWARA;
  • Women on Web;
  • Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan (YKP); 
  • YIFOS Indonesia

Maldives

  • Hope for Women
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)
letter to the editor (the star newspaper, malaysia)

23 February 2011

The Editor,

Menara Star

 

Dear Editor,

The Asian Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW), which is a regional organisation working for women’s rights, believes that it is a woman’s right, and not any one else’s, to decide what to do with her body and her pregnancy. Women are capable, intelligent beings who make difficult choices everyday of their lives. They are half of Malaysia’s population, one third of Malaysia’s workforce, hold 13% of the seats in parliament, are an integral part of Malaysia’s development, and are the only ones who can get pregnant. Why should then we remove that belief in a woman’s capacity to decide, just because it has to with what is most intimately and integrally her business—her body and her pregnancy?Women must be trusted to make choices—whether that is carrying the pregnancy to term and keeping the child, adoption or safe termination of pregnancy. It is the responsibility of the government—which is a secular, not a religious body, and which has committed to gender equality by signing international agreements such as the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Beijing Platform for Action at the UN Fourth World Conference on Women and the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development—to enable and support women to be able to act on their decision safely. This means that women must be given accessible and comprehensive array of services that does not stop at adoption services and halfway homes, but includes access to all methods of contraception services (that empower and allow women informed choice on how to prevent pregnancies in the first place) and safe abortion services.

These services are especially critical for women who have lesser forms of social power at their disposal: the poor, the young, those less educated, migrants and refugees, as well as those whose pregnancies are unintended and the sexual encounters which led to these pregnancies may also have been unwanted. From a humane perspective, choices must always be available. If women choose not to exercise these choices according to their religious beliefs, then it is fine. But we should not let our beliefs colour and limit the choices available.

This letter was published in The Star Newspaper on 27 February 2011. The link to view it is: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/2/27/focus/8141787&sec=focus

 

Morocco

  • Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (AMPF),
  • Morocco Family Planning Association

India

  • CommonHealth;
  • Love Matters India;
  • Pravah;
  • Rural Women’s Social Education Centre (RUWSEC);
  • SAHAYOG;
  • Sahaj;
  • Sahiyo;
  • SAMA – Resource Group for Women and Health;
  • WeSpeakOut;
  • The YP Foundation (TYPF)

Lao PDR

  • Lao Women’s Union;
  • The Faculty of Postgraduate Studies at the University of Health
    Sciences (UHS)

Sri Lanka

  • Bakamoono;
  • Women and Media Collective (WMC),
  • Youth Advocacy Network – Sri Lanka (YANSL)

Malaysia

  • Federation of Reproductive Health Associations of Malaysia (FRHAM);
  • Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG);
  • Justice for Sisters (JFS);
  • Reproductive Health Association of
    Kelantan (ReHAK);
  • Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM);
  • Sisters in Islam (SIS)

Maldives

  • Hope for Women;
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)

Myanmar

  • Colourful Girls Organization;
  • Green Lotus Myanmar

Nepal

  • Beyond Beijing Committee (BBC);
  • Blind Youth Association of Nepal;
  • Blue Diamond Society (BDS);
  • Nepalese Youth for Climate Action (NYCA);
  • Visible Impact;
  • Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC);
  • YPEER Nepal;
  • YUWA

Pakistan

  • Aahung, Centre for Social Policy Development (CSPD);
  • Forum for Dignity Initiative (FDI);
  • Gravity Development Organization; Green Circle Organization;
  • Indus Resources Center (IRC);
  • Idara-e-Taleem-O-Aaghai (ITA);
  • Rehnuma – Family Planning Association Pakistan;
  • Shelter
    Participatory Organisation;
  • Shirkat Gah;
  • The Enlight Lab

Philippines

  • Democratic Socalist Women of the Philippines (DSWP);
  • Galang;
  • Healthcare Without Harm;
  • Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities;
  • Likhaan Centre for Women’s Health;
  • Nisa UI Haqq Fi Bangsamoro;
  • PATH Foundation Inc. (PFPI);
  • Women’s Global Network for
    Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Singapore

  • End Female Genital Cutting Singapore
  • Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Mongolia

  • MONFEMNET National Network