the high level panel of Eminent Persons report to UN Secretary General proposes 12 global goals that are not ambitious enough, do not question the inherent inequalities of the current economic systems, and fail to bring the necessary change to end poverty

Arrow Logo

Reflection on the High Level Panel post 2015 report

By members of the Women’s Major Group1

This critical analysis by the Women’s Major Group members2 on the High­level Panel (HLP) of Eminent Persons report, released on May 30th with recommendations for the Post 2015 Development Agenda3, notes the report as a starting point for discussion, but not good enough. The Women’s Major Group is concerned about the narrow set of goals and the predominance given to the corporate/business sector in the “new” development agenda. We look to the world’s governments to be far more ambitious and focused on addressing the root causes of inequality, injustice and poverty inherent to the existing economic paradigm, as they negotiate the next sustainable development framework in the Open Working Group on SDGs and the Post 2015 Development Agenda.

Contents

  • Goals setting; too reductive to allow for sustainable development
  • A new 15­year time­frame; delaying essential human rights even further!
  • Contradictions; between goals and business­as­usual economic model
  • Human rights ­ inconsistent application
  • Critical analysis of selected specific Goals and Targets and Means of Implementation

 

GOAL 1: End Poverty: too narrow in scope, too one­dimensional

GOAL 2: Empower Girls and Women and achieve Gender Equality: some positive targets, but lacks women’s rights as underpinning the entire development agenda

GOAL3: Provide quality education and life­long learning: lacks girls’ priorities

GOAL 4: Ensure Healthy Lives: some positive targets, but fails to address social Determinants of health

GOAL 5: Ensure Food Security and Good Nutrition: should recognize women’s

GOAL 7: Secure Sustainable Energy: utterly insufficient and likely to have

GOAL 8: Create Jobs, Sustainable Livelihoods, and Equitable Growth: Fails to

GOAL 9: Manage Natural Resource Assets Sustainability: too limiting in defining

GOAL12: Global Enabling environment and Catalyse Long ­-Term Finance: entirely insufficient on finance, trade and climate protection

  • Nothing ‘New’ about proposed Global Governance and Global
  • Partnership for Development
  • No accountability of corporations
  • Financing for Gender Equality should be a priority – it is not in the HLP

 

report

  • Concluding: This report should not be taken as a basis for development of the Post

 

2015 Agenda

Vietnam

  • Centre for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population (CCIHP)

Sri Lanka

  • Bakamoono;
  • Women and Media Collective (WMC),
  • Youth Advocacy Network – Sri Lanka (YANSL)

Singapore

  • End Female Genital Cutting Singapore
  • Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Philippines

  • Democratic Socalist Women of the Philippines (DSWP);
  • Galang;
  • Healthcare Without Harm;
  • Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities;
  • Likhaan Centre for Women’s Health;
  • Nisa UI Haqq Fi Bangsamoro;
  • PATH Foundation Inc. (PFPI);
  • Women’s Global Network for
    Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Pakistan

  • Aahung, Centre for Social Policy Development (CSPD);
  • Forum for Dignity Initiative (FDI);
  • Gravity Development Organization; Green Circle Organization;
  • Indus Resources Center (IRC);
  • Idara-e-Taleem-O-Aaghai (ITA);
  • Rehnuma – Family Planning Association Pakistan;
  • Shelter
    Participatory Organisation;
  • Shirkat Gah;
  • The Enlight Lab

Nepal

  • Beyond Beijing Committee (BBC);
  • Blind Youth Association of Nepal;
  • Blue Diamond Society (BDS);
  • Nepalese Youth for Climate Action (NYCA);
  • Visible Impact;
  • Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC);
  • YPEER Nepal;
  • YUWA

Myanmar

  • Colourful Girls Organization;
  • Green Lotus Myanmar

Maldives

  • Hope for Women;
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)

Malaysia

  • Federation of Reproductive Health Associations of Malaysia (FRHAM);
  • Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG);
  • Justice for Sisters (JFS);
  • Reproductive Health Association of
    Kelantan (ReHAK);
  • Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM);
  • Sisters in Islam (SIS)

Lao PDR

  • Lao Women’s Union;
  • The Faculty of Postgraduate Studies at the University of Health
    Sciences (UHS)

Indonesia

  • Aliansi Satu Visi (ASV);
  • CEDAW Working Group;
  • Hollaback! Jakarta;
  • Institut Kapal Perempuan;
  • Kalyanamitra;
  • Komnas Perempuan;
  • Remaja Independen Papua/Independent Youth
    Forum Papua (FRIP/IYFP);
  • Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia (PKBI);
  • Perkumpulan Lintas Feminis Jakarta;
  • Perkumpulan Pamflet Generasi;
  • RUTGERS Indonesia;
  • Sanggar SWARA;
  • Women on Web;
  • Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan (YKP); 
  • YIFOS Indonesia

India

  • CommonHealth;
  • Love Matters India;
  • Pravah;
  • Rural Women’s Social Education Centre (RUWSEC);
  • SAHAYOG;
  • Sahaj;
  • Sahiyo;
  • SAMA – Resource Group for Women and Health;
  • WeSpeakOut;
  • The YP Foundation (TYPF)

Morocco

  • Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (AMPF),
  • Morocco Family Planning Association
the high level panel of Eminent Persons report to UN Secretary General proposes 12 global goals that are not ambitious enough, do not question the inherent inequalities of the current economic systems, and fail to bring the necessary change to end poverty

Reflection on the High Level Panel post 2015 report

By members of the Women’s Major Group1

This critical analysis by the Women’s Major Group members2 on the High­level Panel (HLP) of Eminent Persons report, released on May 30th with recommendations for the Post 2015 Development Agenda3, notes the report as a starting point for discussion, but not good enough. The Women’s Major Group is concerned about the narrow set of goals and the predominance given to the corporate/business sector in the “new” development agenda. We look to the world’s governments to be far more ambitious and focused on addressing the root causes of inequality, injustice and poverty inherent to the existing economic paradigm, as they negotiate the next sustainable development framework in the Open Working Group on SDGs and the Post 2015 Development Agenda.

Contents

  • Goals setting; too reductive to allow for sustainable development
  • A new 15­year time­frame; delaying essential human rights even further!
  • Contradictions; between goals and business­as­usual economic model
  • Human rights ­ inconsistent application
  • Critical analysis of selected specific Goals and Targets and Means of Implementation

 

GOAL 1: End Poverty: too narrow in scope, too one­dimensional

GOAL 2: Empower Girls and Women and achieve Gender Equality: some positive targets, but lacks women’s rights as underpinning the entire development agenda

GOAL3: Provide quality education and life­long learning: lacks girls’ priorities

GOAL 4: Ensure Healthy Lives: some positive targets, but fails to address social Determinants of health

GOAL 5: Ensure Food Security and Good Nutrition: should recognize women’s

GOAL 7: Secure Sustainable Energy: utterly insufficient and likely to have

GOAL 8: Create Jobs, Sustainable Livelihoods, and Equitable Growth: Fails to

GOAL 9: Manage Natural Resource Assets Sustainability: too limiting in defining

GOAL12: Global Enabling environment and Catalyse Long ­-Term Finance: entirely insufficient on finance, trade and climate protection

  • Nothing ‘New’ about proposed Global Governance and Global
  • Partnership for Development
  • No accountability of corporations
  • Financing for Gender Equality should be a priority – it is not in the HLP

 

report

  • Concluding: This report should not be taken as a basis for development of the Post

 

2015 Agenda

Maldives

  • Hope for Women
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)

Mongolia

  • MONFEMNET National Network