2019

Bangladesh Baseline Research Report – Claiming the Right to Safe Abortion

Categories:

The Government of Bangladesh allows menstrual regulation (MR) as an “interim method of establishing non-pregnancy” regardless of whether women are actually pregnant. MR is widely available across the country and free of cost at public facilities. Despite the wide availability of MR services, accessibility is often restricted due to reasons such as lack of women-friendly environment, failure of health providers to instill confidence in their clients about their services, additional costs for the services, and unauthorized “brokers” who mislead clients to visit private and untrained providers. These barriers have made menstrual regulation with medication (MRM) very popular but have also resulted in its indiscriminate use. MRM is often not used correctly, leading to incomplete abortions and complications. This study was undertaken to obtain a clearer understanding on MRM services, namely gaps in service, barriers to accessing and receiving services, and the needs of women who use MRM.

Vietnam

  • Centre for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population (CCIHP)

Indonesia

  • Aliansi Satu Visi (ASV);
  • CEDAW Working Group;
  • Hollaback! Jakarta;
  • Institut Kapal Perempuan;
  • Kalyanamitra;
  • Komnas Perempuan;
  • Remaja Independen Papua/Independent Youth
    Forum Papua (FRIP/IYFP);
  • Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia (PKBI);
  • Perkumpulan Lintas Feminis Jakarta;
  • Perkumpulan Pamflet Generasi;
  • RUTGERS Indonesia;
  • Sanggar SWARA;
  • Women on Web;
  • Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan (YKP); 
  • YIFOS Indonesia

Maldives

  • Hope for Women
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)
Bangladesh Baseline Research Report - Claiming the Right to Safe Abortion

The Government of Bangladesh allows menstrual regulation (MR) as an “interim method of establishing non-pregnancy” regardless of whether women are actually pregnant. MR is widely available across the country and free of cost at public facilities. Despite the wide availability of MR services, accessibility is often restricted due to reasons such as lack of women-friendly environment, failure of health providers to instill confidence in their clients about their services, additional costs for the services, and unauthorized “brokers” who mislead clients to visit private and untrained providers. These barriers have made menstrual regulation with medication (MRM) very popular but have also resulted in its indiscriminate use. MRM is often not used correctly, leading to incomplete abortions and complications. This study was undertaken to obtain a clearer understanding on MRM services, namely gaps in service, barriers to accessing and receiving services, and the needs of women who use MRM.

Morocco

  • Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (AMPF),
  • Morocco Family Planning Association

India

  • CommonHealth;
  • Love Matters India;
  • Pravah;
  • Rural Women’s Social Education Centre (RUWSEC);
  • SAHAYOG;
  • Sahaj;
  • Sahiyo;
  • SAMA – Resource Group for Women and Health;
  • WeSpeakOut;
  • The YP Foundation (TYPF)

Lao PDR

  • Lao Women’s Union;
  • The Faculty of Postgraduate Studies at the University of Health
    Sciences (UHS)

Sri Lanka

  • Bakamoono;
  • Women and Media Collective (WMC),
  • Youth Advocacy Network – Sri Lanka (YANSL)

Malaysia

  • Federation of Reproductive Health Associations of Malaysia (FRHAM);
  • Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG);
  • Justice for Sisters (JFS);
  • Reproductive Health Association of
    Kelantan (ReHAK);
  • Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM);
  • Sisters in Islam (SIS)

Maldives

  • Hope for Women;
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)

Myanmar

  • Colourful Girls Organization;
  • Green Lotus Myanmar

Nepal

  • Beyond Beijing Committee (BBC);
  • Blind Youth Association of Nepal;
  • Blue Diamond Society (BDS);
  • Nepalese Youth for Climate Action (NYCA);
  • Visible Impact;
  • Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC);
  • YPEER Nepal;
  • YUWA

Pakistan

  • Aahung, Centre for Social Policy Development (CSPD);
  • Forum for Dignity Initiative (FDI);
  • Gravity Development Organization; Green Circle Organization;
  • Indus Resources Center (IRC);
  • Idara-e-Taleem-O-Aaghai (ITA);
  • Rehnuma – Family Planning Association Pakistan;
  • Shelter
    Participatory Organisation;
  • Shirkat Gah;
  • The Enlight Lab

Philippines

  • Democratic Socalist Women of the Philippines (DSWP);
  • Galang;
  • Healthcare Without Harm;
  • Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities;
  • Likhaan Centre for Women’s Health;
  • Nisa UI Haqq Fi Bangsamoro;
  • PATH Foundation Inc. (PFPI);
  • Women’s Global Network for
    Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Singapore

  • End Female Genital Cutting Singapore
  • Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Mongolia

  • MONFEMNET National Network