International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict: Preventing Sexual Violence through Justice and Deterrence

The Asia-Pacific region has been embroiled in multigenerational conflicts for decades[1]; conflicts that arise from unequal distribution of power and resources as well as religious fundamentalism resulting in increased terror attacks. The conflicts and the ensuing displacements and refugee crises presents a multi-pronged human rights issues that especially affect women and girls more than others: exacerbation of systemic violence due to pre-existing structural inequalities; sexual violence which is used as a tactic of war to humiliate, dominate, instil fear in, disperse and/or forcibly relocate civilian members of a community or ethnic groups[2]; and the reaffirmation and escalation of patriarchal forms of control, especially in matters relating to their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR)[3].

The effects of conflicts on SRHR are far-reaching, lasting from their beginnings to well after their resolutions. On the onset of conflicts, for example, child, early and forced marriages are used as a way to ‘protect’ girls and children from sexual violence and abduction as well as to avoid conscription to the military groups. During conflicts, as seen in Timor-Leste during the occupation of Indonesian military and independence struggles[4], hundreds of instances of sexual violence which includes rapes, sexual slavery, forced birth control, torture of pregnant women and forced abortions were documented. Similar types of gender-based violence also occurred during the Maoists insurgency in Nepal between 1996-2006, despite the fact that women constituted 20% of the combatants[5]

Large population displacements that usually follows conflicts – According to UNHCR, as of February 2016, the Asia and Pacific region was home to over 8.5 million persons of concern to UNHCR, including some 3.9 million refugees and 2.9 million internally displaced persons (IDPs)[6] – are also problematic in the context of SRHR. More often than not, SRH services included in humanitarian response packages are limited, if any at all, and rights based approach is completely missing. These gaps resulted in cases such as young Rohingya girls and women who were raped during their boat journeys to Malaysia and Thailand as well as at makeshift camps on the Malaysia-Thai border[7], for example.

The under-reporting of sexual violence in times of conflict is largely due to the victim blaming attitudes and culture of impunities that exist in societies and systems, which cannot guarantee the safety and confidentiality of the victims. ARROW’s study in Myanmar have found that even when military rape against ethnic minority women were reported, they were undertaken by military tribunals which adopts no transparent processes[8] and that often acquits perpetrators. Often military personnel and leaders enjoy constitutional guarantee with a blanket amnesty that protects them from accountability for war crimes, including sexual violence against women in ethnic states[9].  In some countries such as Bangladesh where women have testified before the tribunals set up for war crimes, the women have faced backlash and reprisals in their homes and communities[10].

To leave no one behind and achieve sustainable peace as stipulated in SDG 16, addressing sexual violence in conflict situation is crucial, and it requires a comprehensive, multi-angled approach. ARROW calls on governments and member states to:

  • Address structural inequalities through adoption of new or amendment of existing policies.
  • Ensure that human rights are at centre of conflict resolution, peace processes as well as humanitarian efforts.
  • Recognise agency of women and girls and ensure that their experiences of conflict are represented in conflict resolution and peace processes. Women are not just the victims of conflict but also play active roles in addressing inequalities and building peace.
  • Ensure justice to all who suffered war crimes including sexual violence. This entails ending the culture of impunity for perpetrator irrespective of their position and power. The states should put systems in place for the victims of rape and other gender based violence to testify and seek justice for the crime perpetrated against them.
  • Uphold SRHR of all, especially women and girls in any conflict prevention, resolution and peacebuilding processes as recommended in the General Recommendation 30 of CEDAW Committee in all the humanitarian responses, conflict resolution as well as peace building processes. The recommendation also highlights the need for safe abortion services including post abortion care.
  • Ensure effective implementation of the international instruments such as International Conference on Population Development (ICPD) -Programme of Action (PoA), Beijing Platform for Action (BPfA), UNSCR 1325, and subsequent resolutions including 1820 on Women Peace and Security with their National Action Plans and CEDAW General Recommendations 30.

[1] https://apwaps.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/scoping-study-wps-in-asia.pdf

[2] http://www.unis.unvienna.org/pdf/women_peace_security_resolution1820.pdf

[3] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/AFC-Vol.13-No.3-2007_Conflict.pdf

[4] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/AFC-Vol.13-No.3-2007_Conflict.pdf

[5] http://gbvkr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Asia-Pacific-Regional-Womens-Hearing-on-GBV-in-Conflict-2012-Report.pdf

[6] http://www.unhcr.org/56cd75c29.pdf

[7]https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/rohingya-refugee-and-migrant-women-shadowed-by-sexual-and-gender-based-violence

[8] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Myanmar-Burma-Country-Study.pdf

[9] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Myanmar-Burma-Country-Study.pdf

[10] http://gbvkr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Asia-Pacific-Regional-Womens-Hearing-on-GBV-in-Conflict-2012-Report.pdf

Vietnam

  • Centre for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population (CCIHP)

Indonesia

  • Aliansi Satu Visi (ASV);
  • CEDAW Working Group;
  • Hollaback! Jakarta;
  • Institut Kapal Perempuan;
  • Kalyanamitra;
  • Komnas Perempuan;
  • Remaja Independen Papua/Independent Youth
    Forum Papua (FRIP/IYFP);
  • Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia (PKBI);
  • Perkumpulan Lintas Feminis Jakarta;
  • Perkumpulan Pamflet Generasi;
  • RUTGERS Indonesia;
  • Sanggar SWARA;
  • Women on Web;
  • Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan (YKP); 
  • YIFOS Indonesia

Maldives

  • Hope for Women
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)
International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict: Preventing Sexual Violence through Justice and Deterrence

The Asia-Pacific region has been embroiled in multigenerational conflicts for decades[1]; conflicts that arise from unequal distribution of power and resources as well as religious fundamentalism resulting in increased terror attacks. The conflicts and the ensuing displacements and refugee crises presents a multi-pronged human rights issues that especially affect women and girls more than others: exacerbation of systemic violence due to pre-existing structural inequalities; sexual violence which is used as a tactic of war to humiliate, dominate, instil fear in, disperse and/or forcibly relocate civilian members of a community or ethnic groups[2]; and the reaffirmation and escalation of patriarchal forms of control, especially in matters relating to their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR)[3].

The effects of conflicts on SRHR are far-reaching, lasting from their beginnings to well after their resolutions. On the onset of conflicts, for example, child, early and forced marriages are used as a way to ‘protect’ girls and children from sexual violence and abduction as well as to avoid conscription to the military groups. During conflicts, as seen in Timor-Leste during the occupation of Indonesian military and independence struggles[4], hundreds of instances of sexual violence which includes rapes, sexual slavery, forced birth control, torture of pregnant women and forced abortions were documented. Similar types of gender-based violence also occurred during the Maoists insurgency in Nepal between 1996-2006, despite the fact that women constituted 20% of the combatants[5]

Large population displacements that usually follows conflicts – According to UNHCR, as of February 2016, the Asia and Pacific region was home to over 8.5 million persons of concern to UNHCR, including some 3.9 million refugees and 2.9 million internally displaced persons (IDPs)[6] – are also problematic in the context of SRHR. More often than not, SRH services included in humanitarian response packages are limited, if any at all, and rights based approach is completely missing. These gaps resulted in cases such as young Rohingya girls and women who were raped during their boat journeys to Malaysia and Thailand as well as at makeshift camps on the Malaysia-Thai border[7], for example.

The under-reporting of sexual violence in times of conflict is largely due to the victim blaming attitudes and culture of impunities that exist in societies and systems, which cannot guarantee the safety and confidentiality of the victims. ARROW’s study in Myanmar have found that even when military rape against ethnic minority women were reported, they were undertaken by military tribunals which adopts no transparent processes[8] and that often acquits perpetrators. Often military personnel and leaders enjoy constitutional guarantee with a blanket amnesty that protects them from accountability for war crimes, including sexual violence against women in ethnic states[9].  In some countries such as Bangladesh where women have testified before the tribunals set up for war crimes, the women have faced backlash and reprisals in their homes and communities[10].

To leave no one behind and achieve sustainable peace as stipulated in SDG 16, addressing sexual violence in conflict situation is crucial, and it requires a comprehensive, multi-angled approach. ARROW calls on governments and member states to:

  • Address structural inequalities through adoption of new or amendment of existing policies.
  • Ensure that human rights are at centre of conflict resolution, peace processes as well as humanitarian efforts.
  • Recognise agency of women and girls and ensure that their experiences of conflict are represented in conflict resolution and peace processes. Women are not just the victims of conflict but also play active roles in addressing inequalities and building peace.
  • Ensure justice to all who suffered war crimes including sexual violence. This entails ending the culture of impunity for perpetrator irrespective of their position and power. The states should put systems in place for the victims of rape and other gender based violence to testify and seek justice for the crime perpetrated against them.
  • Uphold SRHR of all, especially women and girls in any conflict prevention, resolution and peacebuilding processes as recommended in the General Recommendation 30 of CEDAW Committee in all the humanitarian responses, conflict resolution as well as peace building processes. The recommendation also highlights the need for safe abortion services including post abortion care.
  • Ensure effective implementation of the international instruments such as International Conference on Population Development (ICPD) -Programme of Action (PoA), Beijing Platform for Action (BPfA), UNSCR 1325, and subsequent resolutions including 1820 on Women Peace and Security with their National Action Plans and CEDAW General Recommendations 30.

[1] https://apwaps.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/scoping-study-wps-in-asia.pdf

[2] http://www.unis.unvienna.org/pdf/women_peace_security_resolution1820.pdf

[3] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/AFC-Vol.13-No.3-2007_Conflict.pdf

[4] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/AFC-Vol.13-No.3-2007_Conflict.pdf

[5] http://gbvkr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Asia-Pacific-Regional-Womens-Hearing-on-GBV-in-Conflict-2012-Report.pdf

[6] http://www.unhcr.org/56cd75c29.pdf

[7]https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/rohingya-refugee-and-migrant-women-shadowed-by-sexual-and-gender-based-violence

[8] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Myanmar-Burma-Country-Study.pdf

[9] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Myanmar-Burma-Country-Study.pdf

[10] http://gbvkr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Asia-Pacific-Regional-Womens-Hearing-on-GBV-in-Conflict-2012-Report.pdf

Morocco

  • Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (AMPF),
  • Morocco Family Planning Association

India

  • CommonHealth;
  • Love Matters India;
  • Pravah;
  • Rural Women’s Social Education Centre (RUWSEC);
  • SAHAYOG;
  • Sahaj;
  • Sahiyo;
  • SAMA – Resource Group for Women and Health;
  • WeSpeakOut;
  • The YP Foundation (TYPF)

Lao PDR

  • Lao Women’s Union;
  • The Faculty of Postgraduate Studies at the University of Health
    Sciences (UHS)

Sri Lanka

  • Bakamoono;
  • Women and Media Collective (WMC),
  • Youth Advocacy Network – Sri Lanka (YANSL)

Malaysia

  • Federation of Reproductive Health Associations of Malaysia (FRHAM);
  • Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG);
  • Justice for Sisters (JFS);
  • Reproductive Health Association of
    Kelantan (ReHAK);
  • Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM);
  • Sisters in Islam (SIS)

Maldives

  • Hope for Women;
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)

Myanmar

  • Colourful Girls Organization;
  • Green Lotus Myanmar

Nepal

  • Beyond Beijing Committee (BBC);
  • Blind Youth Association of Nepal;
  • Blue Diamond Society (BDS);
  • Nepalese Youth for Climate Action (NYCA);
  • Visible Impact;
  • Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC);
  • YPEER Nepal;
  • YUWA

Pakistan

  • Aahung, Centre for Social Policy Development (CSPD);
  • Forum for Dignity Initiative (FDI);
  • Gravity Development Organization; Green Circle Organization;
  • Indus Resources Center (IRC);
  • Idara-e-Taleem-O-Aaghai (ITA);
  • Rehnuma – Family Planning Association Pakistan;
  • Shelter
    Participatory Organisation;
  • Shirkat Gah;
  • The Enlight Lab

Philippines

  • Democratic Socalist Women of the Philippines (DSWP);
  • Galang;
  • Healthcare Without Harm;
  • Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities;
  • Likhaan Centre for Women’s Health;
  • Nisa UI Haqq Fi Bangsamoro;
  • PATH Foundation Inc. (PFPI);
  • Women’s Global Network for
    Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Singapore

  • End Female Genital Cutting Singapore
  • Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Mongolia

  • MONFEMNET National Network