ARROW’s Statement at HRC47: Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the right to education

This statement was submitted to the 47th Session of the Human Rights Council Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the right to education. Click here for a video of the statement.

Respected Delegates,

I am Sai Racherla and I am making this statement on behalf of the Asian Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW).

We thank the Special Rapporteur on the right to education for the report on the cultural dimensions of the right to education.

In March 2021, at the Asia Pacific Forum on Sustainable Development (APFSD) Youth Forum, a diverse group of 500 young activists and advocates in all their diversity from 34 Asia Pacific countries, in the age group of 13-34 years, came together to discuss youth at the forefront of the sustainable development agenda.

Young people at this forum made an unequivocal call to ensure the provision of accurate, evidence-based information and education, including comprehensive sexuality education for adolescents and young people in formal and non-formal education settings, as well as workplace settings. This education needs to recognise and cater to the evolving capacities of young people, and be scientifically evidence-based, context-specific, culturally-sensitive, gender-responsive, and disability-friendly.

The above recommendation from the young people in the Asia Pacific region is crucial to ensuring the universal right to inclusive and quality education without discrimination, exclusion and segregation, as called for in Sustainable Development Goal 4 on education. The right to education including comprehensive sexuality education should be inclusive of cultural diversity and intersectional identities of young people.

 We concur with the special rapporteur on the right to education that to address cultural diversity, we must incorporate all forms of diversity, not just those that are historical, social or related to heritage, language, gender or disability, but also those resulting from particular routes taken in life (e.g., migration, displacement or flight from persecution) or from situations of poverty, extreme poverty, violence or extreme violence.

According to UNHCR, there are 9.2 million people of concern across Asia and the Pacific, including 4.4 million refugees and asylum-seekers, 3.3 million internally displaced people and 2.3 million stateless persons, children and young people included.  We further reiterate that languages spoken by minority, migrant and refugee communities are incorporated into the formal and informal education systems in recognition of linguistic diversity, social and cultural milieu, and their right to education in host countries.

Lastly, we fully concur, with the special rapporteur, that no one should be able to use cultural diversity as a pretext for violating or limiting the scope of the human rights of young people to education including comprehensive sexuality education.

 

Vietnam

  • Centre for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population (CCIHP)

Indonesia

  • Aliansi Satu Visi (ASV);
  • CEDAW Working Group;
  • Hollaback! Jakarta;
  • Institut Kapal Perempuan;
  • Kalyanamitra;
  • Komnas Perempuan;
  • Remaja Independen Papua/Independent Youth
    Forum Papua (FRIP/IYFP);
  • Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia (PKBI);
  • Perkumpulan Lintas Feminis Jakarta;
  • Perkumpulan Pamflet Generasi;
  • RUTGERS Indonesia;
  • Sanggar SWARA;
  • Women on Web;
  • Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan (YKP); 
  • YIFOS Indonesia

Maldives

  • Hope for Women
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)
ARROW’s Statement at HRC47: Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the right to education

This statement was submitted to the 47th Session of the Human Rights Council Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the right to education. Click here for a video of the statement.

Respected Delegates,

I am Sai Racherla and I am making this statement on behalf of the Asian Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW).

We thank the Special Rapporteur on the right to education for the report on the cultural dimensions of the right to education.

In March 2021, at the Asia Pacific Forum on Sustainable Development (APFSD) Youth Forum, a diverse group of 500 young activists and advocates in all their diversity from 34 Asia Pacific countries, in the age group of 13-34 years, came together to discuss youth at the forefront of the sustainable development agenda.

Young people at this forum made an unequivocal call to ensure the provision of accurate, evidence-based information and education, including comprehensive sexuality education for adolescents and young people in formal and non-formal education settings, as well as workplace settings. This education needs to recognise and cater to the evolving capacities of young people, and be scientifically evidence-based, context-specific, culturally-sensitive, gender-responsive, and disability-friendly.

The above recommendation from the young people in the Asia Pacific region is crucial to ensuring the universal right to inclusive and quality education without discrimination, exclusion and segregation, as called for in Sustainable Development Goal 4 on education. The right to education including comprehensive sexuality education should be inclusive of cultural diversity and intersectional identities of young people.

 We concur with the special rapporteur on the right to education that to address cultural diversity, we must incorporate all forms of diversity, not just those that are historical, social or related to heritage, language, gender or disability, but also those resulting from particular routes taken in life (e.g., migration, displacement or flight from persecution) or from situations of poverty, extreme poverty, violence or extreme violence.

According to UNHCR, there are 9.2 million people of concern across Asia and the Pacific, including 4.4 million refugees and asylum-seekers, 3.3 million internally displaced people and 2.3 million stateless persons, children and young people included.  We further reiterate that languages spoken by minority, migrant and refugee communities are incorporated into the formal and informal education systems in recognition of linguistic diversity, social and cultural milieu, and their right to education in host countries.

Lastly, we fully concur, with the special rapporteur, that no one should be able to use cultural diversity as a pretext for violating or limiting the scope of the human rights of young people to education including comprehensive sexuality education.

 

Morocco

  • Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (AMPF),
  • Morocco Family Planning Association

India

  • CommonHealth;
  • Love Matters India;
  • Pravah;
  • Rural Women’s Social Education Centre (RUWSEC);
  • SAHAYOG;
  • Sahaj;
  • Sahiyo;
  • SAMA – Resource Group for Women and Health;
  • WeSpeakOut;
  • The YP Foundation (TYPF)

Lao PDR

  • Lao Women’s Union;
  • The Faculty of Postgraduate Studies at the University of Health
    Sciences (UHS)

Sri Lanka

  • Bakamoono;
  • Women and Media Collective (WMC),
  • Youth Advocacy Network – Sri Lanka (YANSL)

Malaysia

  • Federation of Reproductive Health Associations of Malaysia (FRHAM);
  • Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG);
  • Justice for Sisters (JFS);
  • Reproductive Health Association of
    Kelantan (ReHAK);
  • Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM);
  • Sisters in Islam (SIS)

Maldives

  • Hope for Women;
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)

Myanmar

  • Colourful Girls Organization;
  • Green Lotus Myanmar

Nepal

  • Beyond Beijing Committee (BBC);
  • Blind Youth Association of Nepal;
  • Blue Diamond Society (BDS);
  • Nepalese Youth for Climate Action (NYCA);
  • Visible Impact;
  • Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC);
  • YPEER Nepal;
  • YUWA

Pakistan

  • Aahung, Centre for Social Policy Development (CSPD);
  • Forum for Dignity Initiative (FDI);
  • Gravity Development Organization; Green Circle Organization;
  • Indus Resources Center (IRC);
  • Idara-e-Taleem-O-Aaghai (ITA);
  • Rehnuma – Family Planning Association Pakistan;
  • Shelter
    Participatory Organisation;
  • Shirkat Gah;
  • The Enlight Lab

Philippines

  • Democratic Socalist Women of the Philippines (DSWP);
  • Galang;
  • Healthcare Without Harm;
  • Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities;
  • Likhaan Centre for Women’s Health;
  • Nisa UI Haqq Fi Bangsamoro;
  • PATH Foundation Inc. (PFPI);
  • Women’s Global Network for
    Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Singapore

  • End Female Genital Cutting Singapore
  • Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Mongolia

  • MONFEMNET National Network