ARROW’s Statement at HRC47: Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on Health

This statement was submitted to the 47th Session of the Human Rights Council Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health on behalf of ARROW and the Safe Abortion Advocacy Initiative Global South Engagement (SAIGE). Watch the video statement here.

We commend the Special Rapporteur for recognising the impact that criminalisation and other legal restrictions continue to have on abortion and we welcome the initiative to conduct a thorough appraisal of existing legal and policy restrictions to highlight their discriminatory nature and the impact they have on the enjoyment of the right to health.

The most recent available global data estimates that 45% of all abortions were unsafe.[1] About 3.9 million girls aged 15-19 years undergo unsafe abortions each year in developing regions.[2] Young people across the world face unique vulnerabilities when accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, including abortion, because of their age, race, caste, class, residence, marital status and gender. They are denied bodily autonomy and choice due to imbalance in power relations based on these intersecting facets of discrimination.

Legal and policy barriers have been recognised as amongst the leading barriers to safe abortion, contributing to and compounding other obstacles such as cost, lack of skilled providers, stigma and discriminatory gender norms. Restrictive laws not only harm public health, but also social justice. Young people, especially adolescents are not able to access SRH services, including information and education. This puts them at increased risk of exposure to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, unwanted pregnancies and other health risks due to unsafe abortion. The age of consent restrictions further impede access to SRH services.

Young people have the right to have access to the full spectrum of SRH services, including contraception, comprehensive sexuality education, maternity care, post abortion care and safe abortion.[3] We need an intersectional understanding and a rights-based approach to the provision of abortion services for young people that recognises the principle of evolving capacities and their ability to make autonomous decisions about their sexual and reproductive health. Furthermore, we need to reform colonial-era penal codes and adopt legal frameworks that truly advance bodily autonomy, sexual and reproductive health and rights and gender equality.

[1] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/SAIGE-Decriminalisation-of-Abortion.pdf

[2] https://www.guttmacher.org/report/adding-it-meeting-contraceptive-needs-of-adolescents#

[3] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/SAIGE_Young-Women-and-Abortion.pdf

Vietnam

  • Centre for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population (CCIHP)

Indonesia

  • Aliansi Satu Visi (ASV);
  • CEDAW Working Group;
  • Hollaback! Jakarta;
  • Institut Kapal Perempuan;
  • Kalyanamitra;
  • Komnas Perempuan;
  • Remaja Independen Papua/Independent Youth
    Forum Papua (FRIP/IYFP);
  • Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia (PKBI);
  • Perkumpulan Lintas Feminis Jakarta;
  • Perkumpulan Pamflet Generasi;
  • RUTGERS Indonesia;
  • Sanggar SWARA;
  • Women on Web;
  • Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan (YKP); 
  • YIFOS Indonesia

Maldives

  • Hope for Women
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)
ARROW’s Statement at HRC47: Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on Health

This statement was submitted to the 47th Session of the Human Rights Council Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health on behalf of ARROW and the Safe Abortion Advocacy Initiative Global South Engagement (SAIGE). Watch the video statement here.

We commend the Special Rapporteur for recognising the impact that criminalisation and other legal restrictions continue to have on abortion and we welcome the initiative to conduct a thorough appraisal of existing legal and policy restrictions to highlight their discriminatory nature and the impact they have on the enjoyment of the right to health.

The most recent available global data estimates that 45% of all abortions were unsafe.[1] About 3.9 million girls aged 15-19 years undergo unsafe abortions each year in developing regions.[2] Young people across the world face unique vulnerabilities when accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, including abortion, because of their age, race, caste, class, residence, marital status and gender. They are denied bodily autonomy and choice due to imbalance in power relations based on these intersecting facets of discrimination.

Legal and policy barriers have been recognised as amongst the leading barriers to safe abortion, contributing to and compounding other obstacles such as cost, lack of skilled providers, stigma and discriminatory gender norms. Restrictive laws not only harm public health, but also social justice. Young people, especially adolescents are not able to access SRH services, including information and education. This puts them at increased risk of exposure to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, unwanted pregnancies and other health risks due to unsafe abortion. The age of consent restrictions further impede access to SRH services.

Young people have the right to have access to the full spectrum of SRH services, including contraception, comprehensive sexuality education, maternity care, post abortion care and safe abortion.[3] We need an intersectional understanding and a rights-based approach to the provision of abortion services for young people that recognises the principle of evolving capacities and their ability to make autonomous decisions about their sexual and reproductive health. Furthermore, we need to reform colonial-era penal codes and adopt legal frameworks that truly advance bodily autonomy, sexual and reproductive health and rights and gender equality.

[1] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/SAIGE-Decriminalisation-of-Abortion.pdf

[2] https://www.guttmacher.org/report/adding-it-meeting-contraceptive-needs-of-adolescents#

[3] https://arrow.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/SAIGE_Young-Women-and-Abortion.pdf

Morocco

  • Association Marocaine de Planification Familiale (AMPF),
  • Morocco Family Planning Association

India

  • CommonHealth;
  • Love Matters India;
  • Pravah;
  • Rural Women’s Social Education Centre (RUWSEC);
  • SAHAYOG;
  • Sahaj;
  • Sahiyo;
  • SAMA – Resource Group for Women and Health;
  • WeSpeakOut;
  • The YP Foundation (TYPF)

Lao PDR

  • Lao Women’s Union;
  • The Faculty of Postgraduate Studies at the University of Health
    Sciences (UHS)

Sri Lanka

  • Bakamoono;
  • Women and Media Collective (WMC),
  • Youth Advocacy Network – Sri Lanka (YANSL)

Malaysia

  • Federation of Reproductive Health Associations of Malaysia (FRHAM);
  • Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG);
  • Justice for Sisters (JFS);
  • Reproductive Health Association of
    Kelantan (ReHAK);
  • Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM);
  • Sisters in Islam (SIS)

Maldives

  • Hope for Women;
  • Society for Health Education (SHE)

Myanmar

  • Colourful Girls Organization;
  • Green Lotus Myanmar

Nepal

  • Beyond Beijing Committee (BBC);
  • Blind Youth Association of Nepal;
  • Blue Diamond Society (BDS);
  • Nepalese Youth for Climate Action (NYCA);
  • Visible Impact;
  • Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC);
  • YPEER Nepal;
  • YUWA

Pakistan

  • Aahung, Centre for Social Policy Development (CSPD);
  • Forum for Dignity Initiative (FDI);
  • Gravity Development Organization; Green Circle Organization;
  • Indus Resources Center (IRC);
  • Idara-e-Taleem-O-Aaghai (ITA);
  • Rehnuma – Family Planning Association Pakistan;
  • Shelter
    Participatory Organisation;
  • Shirkat Gah;
  • The Enlight Lab

Philippines

  • Democratic Socalist Women of the Philippines (DSWP);
  • Galang;
  • Healthcare Without Harm;
  • Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities;
  • Likhaan Centre for Women’s Health;
  • Nisa UI Haqq Fi Bangsamoro;
  • PATH Foundation Inc. (PFPI);
  • Women’s Global Network for
    Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Singapore

  • End Female Genital Cutting Singapore
  • Reproductive Rights (WGNRR)

Mongolia

  • MONFEMNET National Network